Just sayin'

Criticism and Controversies Surrounding Unreliable B’Tselem. Over the years, the Israeli NGO B'Tselem has faced extensive criticism from journalists, politicians, activists, researchers, and advocacy organizations who accuse it of political bias, manipulation of facts, cooperation with anti-Israel campaigns, incitement and reliance on foreign funding. Early Criticism and Media Controversies. A 2008 article in Ynet News titled “Collaborating with the enemy” criticized B’Tselem’s camera distribution project among Palestinians, claiming the organization selectively documented Israeli misconduct while ignoring Palestinian violence. The article described the initiative as part of a “propaganda cooperation with the enemy” and accused activists of orchestrating “photogenic provocations” against Israeli soldiers and settlers. In another Ynet article from 2016, “A wakeup call for the left,” Ben-Dror Yemini pointed out that parts of the Israeli left had shifted from criticizing Israeli polic...

If you had any doubts about the true motivations and malicious agenda behind those promoting the “genocide” narrative, just look at how quickly the same biased and openly anti-Israel Wikipedia editors rushed to create a page framing any challenge to that claim as “denial.” The goal is not honest debate or historical accuracy — it is to delegitimize Israel, silence dissent, and distort the meaning of genocide itself. In many ways, this has become a sophisticated modern form of Holocaust distortion and even indirect Holocaust denial: by trivializing and weaponizing the term “genocide” against the Jewish state, they erode the historical uniqueness and documented reality of the Holocaust while turning its language against its survivors and descendants .

Summaries of Critiques of Gilbert Achcar ### 1. *The dangerous idiots of academia* (2015) David Collier argues that Achcar represents a trend within parts of academia that, in Collier’s view, excuses or minimizes Islamist extremism and antisemitism when framed through anti-imperialist or anti-Zionist politics. The article criticizes Achcar for supporting positions hostile to Israel while overlooking authoritarian or extremist elements within Hamas and related movements. ### 2. Signature on the 2009 boycott letter Critics highlighted Achcar’s support for a boycott letter during the Gaza conflict that argued Israel “must lose” against Hamas. Evidence that Achcar prioritized ideological hostility toward Israel over concerns about [genocidal] Hamas’s ideology, violence, or governance. ### 3. *Politics gets in the way* (Jerusalem Post, 2010) Seth J. Frantzman criticizes Achcar’s *The Arabs and the Holocaust* for downplaying Arab and Islamist antisemitism. Frantzman points out that Achcar fr...

Forwarded via email: Wikipedia Gaza Genocide Page Editors Controversy - Grok. Feb 11, 2026. QUESTION: THE PALLYWEID PROPAGANDA "GAZA  (so-called) GENOCIDE" PAGE ON WIKIPEDIA. 1. Who were the editors [user names] advocating for the "Gaza (so-called) genocide" accusation on page in Wikipedia?  ---- 2. Have any editors, advocating for the so-called "genocide", been accused of bias and/or coordinated editing? Which usernames were they, [elaborated] list here as many as possible? List those usernames named outside Wikipedia too. ---- 3. Were any editors known to be anti-Israel—especially those known to work in coordination—involved in determining what qualifies as a “reliable source”? ---- 4. "Cross-references" between the usernames of editors involved in the "genocide" accusation and the deletion of "Nazism in Palestinian Society." ---- 5. "Cross-references" between the usernames of editors involved in the "genocide...

Digital Erasure of Jewish Victims: The Wikipedia Campaign to Protect Genocidal "Palestine" Leadership and Rewrite History. The same coordinated clique of Wikipedians that previously promoted Pallyweid and amplified genocidal Hamas narratives—relying heavily on Turkey/Qatar/Iran-linked, demonstrably unreliable sources—is now actively sabotaging factual coverage of the Islamic Hanukkah Massacre. Their pattern is consistent: marginalize Jewish victims, blur or excuse Islamist violence, and replace documented facts with ideologically driven distortions. This is not neutral editing but a sustained effort to erase Jewish suffering, shield extremist actors from scrutiny, and weaponize Wikipedia against historical truth and Jewish self-defense. ___ Wikipedia debating if attack targeting Jews at Sydney Chanukah event was ‘terror’ JNS . December 16, 2025. Wikipedia debating if attack targeting Jews at Sydney Chanukah event was ‘terror’. Deborah Lipstadt, scholar and former U.S....

Clear Eyewitness Testimony vs. Wikipedia Promoted Israel Gershoni’s Sanitized Narrative Arab Support for Nazi Germany in Mandatory Palestine During WWII The following relies on the firsthand oral testimony recorded in: Arbel, T. The Story of Muhammad Abu Sarari (Hebrew). Ra’anana: Docostory, 2000. * Snippet from a book translated into English: Page 13: From the events of '36, I have a childhood memory. Then the gangs were active and terrorized the Jews. The one who organized them was Hassan Salama. The gang members wanted to cause harm to the Jews who bought agricultural goods from the Arabs. They would lie in wait in the wadis and on the roads for Arab merchants who smuggled vegetables and fruit to the Hatikva market. If they caught the smugglers, they would beat them, throw their goods at them, and the poor people would return home without the money and without the goods. The ones who benefited from all this were us children. We collected everythi...