Posts

Showing posts from May, 2026

Unreliable source: Gilbert Achcar

Summaries of Critiques of Gilbert Achcar ### 1. *The dangerous idiots of academia* (2015) David Collier argues that Achcar represents a trend within parts of academia that, in Collier’s view, excuses or minimizes Islamist extremism and antisemitism when framed through anti-imperialist or anti-Zionist politics. The article criticizes Achcar for supporting positions hostile to Israel while overlooking authoritarian or extremist elements within Hamas and related movements. ### 2. Signature on the 2009 boycott letter Critics highlighted Achcar’s support for a boycott letter during the Gaza conflict that argued Israel “must lose” against Hamas. Evidence that Achcar prioritized ideological hostility toward Israel over concerns about [genocidal] Hamas’s ideology, violence, or governance. ### 3. *Politics gets in the way* (Jerusalem Post, 2010) Seth J. Frantzman criticizes Achcar’s *The Arabs and the Holocaust* for downplaying Arab and Islamist antisemitism. Frantzman points out that Achcar fr...

Pallywood wins Pulitzers. Start a blood libel. Stage the Pallywood. Win a Pulitzer

Image
Pallywood wins Pulitzers.  'Start a blood libel. Stage the Pallywood. Win a Pulitzer.' 'Start a blood libel, stage the Pallywood, dominate the headlines, and by the time the hoax collapses, the Pulitzer is already on the shelf.'  Saul Sadka @Saul_Sadka: Start a blood libel, win a Pulitzer Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok You literally cannot make this up The photojournalist of this front page NYT piece Saher Alghorra just won a Pulitzer Prize NYT had to issue a retraction because the entire story was fake. So you can win a pulitzer now after fabricating an entire hoax story 🤡 Unreal. May 7, 2026 https://x.com/Saul_Sadka/status/2052539777438670979